5 Essential Principles for Sonrise

[The following is how I began my preaching ministry 10 years ago. These principles are still foundational for us today. I have adapted this transcript to apply to our present context.  My prayer is that these five ideas will revitalize your love for your church and Jesus Christ—the head of His church!]

Well… I’m scared to death! I know that might not be the most encouraging thing for you to hear, but I felt I needed to begin my ministry with complete transparency. I know my limitations and yet God, whether in his humor or his wisdom, has placed me here at this time as your minister. I must tell you, I feel like a lion in the midst of a bunch of Daniels. I’m merely pushing 28 and I’m supposed to somehow enlighten you saints-of-the-faith. Moreover, ole’ James tells me that those who take on the responsibility of a Bible teacher will face stricter judgment (James 3:1)! So, I have to be honest, I really think I’m way in over my head!

However, I’m keeping a few things in mind that are removing some of those human worries we go through.

First, while I have been designated as the one who has been set apart for the purposes of pastoring and teaching, I wish it to be plain and clear that you and I are no different. All of us here this morning are helpless without the grace of our Lord and savior Jesus Christ. A book I read once was entitled “The Witness of Preaching.” The author suggested in the book that the preacher is basically a member of the church who simply bears witness to the truth of the Gospel. That’s what I will be doing every Sunday with you: simply bearing witness to the Gospel.

Second, I am a plant eagerly waiting to be watered by the enormous amount of wisdom sprinkled throughout this congregation. I am asking you to take me under your wing and assist me in my ministry.

Finally, I also feel that God has in fact placed me with you to utilize my specific gifts of preaching, teaching, and leading, in order to edify our church. I am reminded of Paul’s words to young Timothy: “don’t let anyone look down on you because you are young but set an example.” That’s what I long to accomplish here; to set an example. So I am asking you to work along with me; allow me to lead as I seek God’s leadership for our congregation.

Now, I wholeheartedly believe that God has some huge things in store for Sonrise! I believe that Paul’s words to the Ephesians in Ephesians 3:20 are what we all should long for: “Now to him who is able to do far more abundantly than all that we ask or think, according to the power at work within us.” The question is, do we truly long for God to grow our church, both spiritually and numerically? If so, I believe we as a church need to get on the same page, running the same race. For that to occur I believe we need to adopt five foundational and timely principles that will help keep all of us focused on the same goal. I want us to consider being a church that embraces an unchanging message, a fluctuating method, a focused ministry, a unifying mentality, and a proper mood.

UNCHANGING MESSAGE

If Sonrise desires to be a church that truly lives out God’s mission we first must decide that the gospel message never changes and that we never compromise the timeless truth of what we read in scripture. It may seem tempting at times to soften the truth claims of the Bible, especially when they go contrary to what the culture is saying around us. However, God will not bless the church that strays away from the Gospel. The Gospel is too important.

What do I mean when I say “the Gospel?” The phrase “the Gospel” is quite a vague and detailed statement is it not? Well yes and no. When I say the Gospel the implications that stem from it are insurmountable. In fact, in some sense everything in the Bible is “the Gospel.” The reason is because “Gospel” literally means “good news,” that is, good news concerning Jesus Christ, and the Bible from beginning to end is a big arrow pointing to Jesus. However, on the other hand the Gospel is quite simple. Paul defined it in 1 Corinthians 15:1-5:

Now I would remind you, brothers, of the gospel I preached to you, which you received, in which you stand, and by which you are being saved, if you hold fast to the word I preached to you—unless you believed in vain.For I delivered to you as of first importance what I also received: that Christ died for our sins in accordance with the Scriptures, that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day in accordance with the Scriptures, and that he appeared to Cephas, then to the twelve.

Thus, what we are concerned with are the fundamental areas of doctrine in which we do not compromise, which  are essentially (1) Christ, (2) our sins, (3) Christ’s burial, (4) His resurrection, and (5) his appearance. These are the essential elements of our faith; the things that we never sway on. Now, this does not mean that all other matters that are spoken of in the Bible are insignificant or unimportant. I am simply saying that the most important elements of the Gospel—the things that you and I must get right all surround Jesus. If we don’t get Jesus right we have got nothing right! Paul expresses how important the Gospel is in another letter:

I am astonished that you are so quickly deserting him who called you in the grace of Christ and are turning to a different gospel— not that there is another one, but there are some who trouble you and want to distort the gospel of Christ. But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach to you a gospel contrary to the one we preached to you, let him be accursed (Galatians 1:6-8).

So, in order for us as a church to succeed in furthering God’s Kingdom we must stay true to the Gospel. We live in a culture today that seeks to relativize all truth. That is, in our postmodern society truth is non-existent; the only truth that does exist is the truth that there is no such thing as truth. You have probably heard it somewhere: what you believe is true for you and what I believe is true is true for me. We live in an age of relativism.

The Christian Philosopher Ravi Zacharias tells a story about visiting a peculiar building. He was informed that Time magazine described it as the first postmodern building. He asked the writer “What is a postmodern building?” He said, “The architect believed since life itself has no purpose or meaning, why should our buildings have any purpose and meaning. So he designed the building without any particular purpose in mind. There are stairways that go nowhere, there are shapes of rooms that are absolutely unusable. People come to see this building, but it serves no particular purpose. When asked what he thought Ravi replied, “I have only one question for the architect: Did he do that with the foundation as well?  Did he just do it whimsically? Or did he have to follow certain guidelines because the infrastructure can look magnificent, but, if the foundation doesn’t hold the whole thing will collapse and there’s no city council that I know that will allow you to do it on a whim, without having a purpose to sustain what you are putting above it.”[1]

So in an age of non-truth we must always be on the foreground proclaiming the timeless truth of God’s word!

Bob Russell in his book “When God Builds a Church” tells that before moving into their brand new church building, which was built because of considerable growth, there staff members gathered together to pray over the future of their congregation. As a sign of always seeking to follow the truth, each staff person took spray paint and wrote scripture references that applied to their area of ministry.  Children’s ministers wrote passages like “let the little children come unto me” and the worship ministers wrote passages like “sing a new song unto the Lord.” Before long the whole church caught word and soon the entire church floors were covered in scripture references. One particular time a small group got together and decided to write some scripture on the floor. Someone asked “what should we write?” They thought a minute, and soon someone spoke up and said “what about “where two or three are gathered in my name there I am in the midst of them?” Someone replied: “What is the scripture reference?” “I think it is Matthew 18:28.” With that they wrote the reference and went home. Later that evening the individual that spouted out the reference began to wonder if he’d gotten it right. He picked up a Bible and soon read: But when that same servant went out, he found one of his fellow servants who owed him a hundred denarii, and seizing him, he began to choke him, saying, ‘Pay what you owe.’ Bob Russell went on to say “if you are ever at Southeast CC and you get the feeling to choke someone you know why!” [2]

Folks, if we want to grow we have got to place the truth of the Gospel at the foundation of our ministry. If we don’t we had better pack up and quit now, because we will not accomplish anything without the Gospel. As Paul states beautifully: For I am not ashamed of the gospel, for it is the power of God for salvation to everyone who believes (Romans 1:16).

FLUCTUATING METHOD

For Sonrise to grow we have to maintain the unchanging message of the Gospel. But we must be willing to have a fluctuating method. Bob Russell has said, “methods are plenty, principles are few. Methods always change, principles never do.  If there is one area, I think congregations may fail to do is distinguish between the message and method. As a result, the church remains mundane, disconnected from the community, and fail to adequately reach the lost.  A sad reality is when the Gospel becomes ineffective because of an unwillingness to do what it takes to reach the world with the Gospel.

This principle for a lot of us is a difficult one to embrace. For many of us we have been doing the same thing for years and there isn’t anybody who will tell us differently. I can’t tell you how many times I have heard “we have been doing it like this for years!” The problem, however, is that the way we have been doing things is not working. And because it is not working the Gospel is not successfully reaching those who desperately need it.  Evangelism methods yesterday may not be effective today. Worship services yesterday may not be effective today. Therefore, as a church we need to be willing to set aside our own personal preferences and embrace methods that will better enhance the gospel and grow believers.

The apostle Paul understood this principle well. How people heard about the gospel was not as important as to whom he was speaking the Gospel to. Listen to what he says in 1 Corinthians 9:19-23:

For though I am free from all, I have made myself a servant of all, that I might win more of them. To the Jews I became as a Jew, in order to win Jews. To those under the law I became as one under the law (though not being myself under the law) that I might win those under the law. To those outside the law I became as one outside the law (not being outside the law of God but under the law of Christ) that I might win those outside the law. To the weak, that I might win the weak. I have become all things to all people, that by all means I might save some. I do it all for the sake of the gospel, that I might share with them in its blessings.

You see the implications here? Paul, for the sake of the gospel, is willing to use whatever means (or methods) possible in order to reach people for the gospel. The gospel is that important. Some may think that Paul seems somewhat like a people-pleaser, but that’s not the point here. What Paul is not compromising is the gospel. As we have already seen, Paul is very adamant about preaching the true gospel. However, what Paul does not discourage is using whatever means possible in order to reach people for the true gospel. Paul distinguishes between the message and the method.

A caveat here may be appropriate. I am not saying as some have popularly stated, “we should do anything short of sin to win people far from God.” I think that mentality goes a bit too far and misunderstands the meaning and purpose of the local gathering of the church. We need to understand that the Sunday morning gathering is primarily for the believer. We should never remove fundamental elements in the worship service in the name of pragmatism. Some churches for example, have taken communion out of the service because it might make unbelievers feel uncomfortable. I think that the very nature of the local gathering of the church should and will make any unbeliever uncomfortable. If it doesn’t that may be a sign that the message (see previous point) is being dulled. So what am I saying? Simply this: we need to simultaneously maintain a holiness distinct from the world while creatively seeking ways to reach our unbelieving friends and neighbors. In essence this is a call to avoid traditionalism.

Some examples may help clarify:

  • Moving from passing offering plates to online giving
  • Playing contemporary hymns and praise choruses.
  • Our decision to sell our property to allocate funds for investing in additional staff.
  • Adding additional services to accommodate growth.
  • Moving locations for better Kingdom Impact.
  • Utilizing technology for gospel reach.
  • Eliminating programs to focus on discipleship
  • Flexibility in how we go about discipleship (e.g. Wednesday gathering opposed to small groups)

I knew of a church that had an organ that was once used in the worship services 50 years prior. In its time the organ served as a wonderful tool for the worship services and blessed a number of people who attended the church. However, over time worship styles changed and it came time to move onto different types of instruments to reach a new generation for the gospel. The church decided to sell the organ and use the funds to supply the worship ministry with some much needed renovations in order to develop a service that would appeal to the un-churched. Unfortunately, a few individuals protested the idea because the organ was a donation from someone years and years ago. To sell the organ would remove a big piece of tradition to the church. So instead of improving the service and seeking to reach out to more people for the gospel tradition won and the gospel was smothered. I believe the organ still collects dust in one of the Sunday School classrooms.

Let’s not let our traditions get in the way of the gospel. Let’s decide now: whatever it takes to reach the lost—if it works , and it doesn’t compromise scriptural mandate, let’s do it!

FOCUSED MINISTRY

Tom Rainer, church growth guru, has said that “business does not equal effectiveness.” For many, a healthy church is directly correlated with a busy church. But a church can be doing a lot of things and not necessarily doing the most PROFITABLE thing. The Apostle Paul wrote, “all things are lawful, but not all things are beneficial (1 Cor. 10:23).” We should carry that principle into our ministry at Sonrise. Just because we can do a particular program doesn’t mean we SHOULD do a particular program. Instead of doing a lot of things poorly, we should consider doing a few things well.

Imagine if you will, 10 empty five-gallon buckets. Now, imagine there is separate five-gallon bucket filled to the brim with water. The bucket of water represents a church’s resources (time, energy, people, money, etc.). The ten buckets represent various programs a church may consider implementing. If, however, you begin to pour water (resources) into each of the ten buckets (programs) you will discover that the church may be doing a lot of things, but the programs are very shallow in effectiveness. What if instead of ten-plus programs for a church of 100 members we dialed it down to 3. Yes, we wouldn’t be doing as much but we would be doing things much better. It is an issue of quality over quantity.

Presently, Sonrise has 3 main buckets of programming—(1) Sunday Morning worship, (2) Wednesday Night Gathering, and (3) Serving teams. This in and of itself keeps us plenty busy! Instead of wishing we could do more programming, let’s pour all we have into these three “buckets” until we grow and get healthy enough to add to our plate more ministry programs. As Paul told Timothy, “Fulfill your ministry (2 Tim. 4:5).”

UNIFYING MENTALITY

Why does Sonrise exist? If I was to go around to each member of our congregation and ask this question would I receive the same answer, every time? My hope would be yes, but statistically the answer would be an unfortunate no. It has nothing to do with the desire we all have to see Sonrise grow and reach the lost. It simply means that we have never had a clear roadmap of how to get it done. Thus, one of the significant principles we must have in order to be a growing church is a unifying mentality.

If we desire for our church to succeed we have all got to be on the same page. We’ve got to be heading in the same direction, with the same mission, and the same goal. If not, we’ll end up battling against each other and as a result the gospel will lose its effectiveness. The church of Corinth had troubles uniting together. They all had their own agendas and their own ideas of what the church was about. As a result, bitterness and divisiveness emerged. Paul wrote to them and gave them some timeless truths that I think are essential for us today. Listen to these words from 1Corinthians 1:10

I appeal to you brothers by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that all of you agree, and that there be no divisions among you, but that you be united in the same mind and the same judgment.

There’s something beautiful about the piano. I started playing when I was 15 years old. I was that annoying kid that would jump onto the stage directly after the Sunday morning service and began banging away “Mary had a little lamb” while everyone was still trying to fellowship after the service. I love the piano. But for the piano to work properly all of the keys have got to function the way they are supposed to. Each key is designed to fit into the grand purpose of the piano. Suppose the g note decided to sound like an a not and a d note really liked his neighbor the c# note and so decided to sound like it. The worship band would definitely have a hard time keeping us on key. You see, the piano and all of its keys have one designed purpose, and that’s to make beautiful music. Similarly, we as the church have a design, to glorify our creator and tell everyone we can about him. However, if we as a church have no direction, no goals, no vision, then we will simply walk around aimlessly trying to figure out the best way to fulfill our purpose as a local congregation. Therefore, in order for us to grow, we have to understand where we’re headed—what our plan is to make disciples, and then use our individual gifts to make it happen.

What is our vision as a church? We exist to “pursue maturity by making disciples.” Everything we do must be filtered through this question—will this help us make disciples? Only the best of programming should be implemented for us to reach this goal!

PROPER MOOD

For Sonrise to grow we must be a church with an unchangeable message, fluctuating methods, focused ministry, a unifying mentality, and finally a proper mood. After all is said and done we as a church need to be a church that loves. We could have the right message, use the right methods, and be united but if we don’t have love it means nothing. This principle is summed up beautifully by the apostle John in 1 John 4:7-12:

Beloved, let us love one another for love is from God, and whoever loves has been born of God and knows God. Anyone who does not love does not know God because God is love. In this the love of God was made manifest among us, that God sent his only son into the world, so that we might live through him. In this is love, not that we have loved God but that he loved us and sent his son as a propitiation for our sins. Beloved, if God so loved us we also ought to love one another. No one has ever seen God; if we love one another God abides in us and his love is perfected in us.

Let me suggest four areas Love must exist in our church for us to be faithful:

  1. Love Christ—we need to have a deep affection and desire for Christ. With the Apostle Paul we should exclaim, “I count everything as loss for the surpassing worth of knowing Christ Jesus My Lord (Philippians 3:8).”
  2. Love His Word—The love of the Word of God must saturate our gatherings. We must come eager and hungry for the Word of God. We should desire the teaching of His word and the feeding upon His truths. As the Psalmist writes, “Oh How I Love your Law (Psalm 119:97).”
  3. Love His People—Jesus said, they will know you are my disciples by your love for one another (John 13:35). Love is what binds us all together. Love for one another is our greatest apologetic to a loss and dying world!
  4. Love His Mission—When you believe in and love the cause we are about  (Making disciples) then you can’t wait to invite your friends to church, serve in a needed area, arrive early and stay later, fellowship, be with God’s People, Daydream about what God has in store, look forward to Sunday Morning! A church that’s in love with the Mission is a contagious church!

Conclusion

I don’t know about you but I am ready for Sonrise to explode in our community with the gospel. I believe that God has placed us together for such a time as this. However, if we’re going to sincerely seek to be as effective as we can for the Kingdom of God it is crucial for us to follow these five biblical principles: an unchanging message, fluctuating method, focused ministry, unifying mentality, and a proper mood. If we do that God will open the floodgates and truly bless our church. I hope you’re ready!


[1] Taken from: http://rodiagnusdei.wordpress.com/2012/02/25/ravi-zacharias-if-the-foundations-be-destroyed-at-trinity-international-university-feb-9-2012/

[2] Russell, Bob. When God Builds a Church.

Why Don’t Theologians Agree on the Issue of God’s Sovereignty and Human Responsibility?

In my last post I expressed sympathies with my Calvinist friends. And frankly, I am tempted (sometimes) to throw my hands up and say with Rodney King, “Can’t we all just get along?” But after a cup of coffee, I remind myself that getting our doctrine right is not just important—It’s the duty of every Christian. But it’s especially vital for the Pastor. Paul is clear on this point: “He must hold firm to the trustworthy word as taught, so that he may be able to give instruction in sound doctrine and also to rebuke those who contradict it (Titus 1:9).” I am reminded of the penetrating words of J. Gresham Machen at this point (who was a Calvinist!), “In the Sphere of religion, as in other spheres, the things about which men are agreed are apt to be the things that are least worth holding; the really important things are the things about which men will fight (Machen, J. Gresham. Christianity and Liberalism, 1-2).” And while I still stand by my words in the previous post, I don’t want to imply that this doctrinal divide is unimportant. On the contrary, because the topic deals with issues of soteriology (i.e. salvation), it is of utmost importance that we strive to get the Bible’s teaching on this right (even if it isn’t an issue that is heretical in nature).

The Main Point: Hermeneutics

Now, to the main point I want to make in this post—why is it that godly, faithful, Bible scholars and preachers divide over the issue of election, predestination, freewill, sovereignty, and the like? It seems to me that one of the reasons involves hermeneutics. Hermeneutics is the science of interpretation. When we study scripture, we dare not do so arbitrarily or frivolously. Hermeneutics offers rules of interpretation that assist the interpreter in understanding the Bible accurately. However, when it comes to summarizing ones understanding of what the Bible teaches regarding a topic such as the relationship between God’s sovereignty and mans responsibility, we move from dealing with an isolated passage of scripture (that is, isolated from the rest of the Bible; not necessarily from its immediate grammatical context), to understanding how the Bible as a whole speaks to, what seems on the surface, two contradictory ideas—God is completely in control; and humanity has free will. This approach to understanding scripture is called Systematic Theology. Systematic Theology presupposes a particular view of the Bible; namely, that the Bible is a cohesive, non-contradictory, whole. Jack Cottrell summarizes:

Since the whole Bible is God’s inerrant word, it possesses the quality of epistemic unity. That means that everything it teaches, from Genesis to Revelation, is a single body of consistent truth. This is true of all its doctrines combined, and also of any one specific doctrine… Thus, to have a complete understanding of [any particular subject in the Bible], we must study everything the Bible says about [it], and then set forth our conclusions as a unified whole.

Cottrell, Jack., Power from on High., 11.

When it comes to a topic as complex as God’s sovereignty and man’s responsibility, one can’t simply settle the matter on the exegesis of two or three passages. Nor is it as simple as pointing to a text that explicitly settles the issue. There is not, for example, a verse that says “God chooses who will be saved apart from their choice to believe (Calvinism).” Or, “God would never overrule man’s choice to believe (Arminianism). The task is to collect all the material the Bible has to say on the issue and then formulate a “system” of thought that corresponds with the data collected.

A Trinitarian Hermeneutic

Understanding election and free will is akin to the way we understand the doctrine of the Trinity. The word or concept of the Trinity is nowhere tersely stated, “God is one being and three persons.” Nevertheless, as one studies the entire Bible it compels the interpreter to conclude that this is exactly what the Bible teaches. When all the data is collected, God as a Trinity is inescapable. Similarly, when seeking to understand whether Calvinism or Arminianism is correct it will involve a systematized effort on the part of the interpreter.

Our Preunderstandings

So, if we understand that systematic theology is the key to  achieving closure on this issue, why is there still a great divide on this topic? Klein (et al) offers a very helpful observation:

The systematic theologians’ own preunderstandings shape the categories and issues they use in their systems (though they may insist, with some justification, that their goal is to allow the Bible’s own teaching to provide guidance). As well, the theologians’ own perspectives will guide their selection process as they choose various texts within each category and as they determine the relative weight to give the Bible’s various teachings on specific issues. This is readily apparent when one reads the theologies dealing with specific controversial issues, say election versus free will. People come to different positions on the Bible’s teaching on this matter because they bring different preunderstandings to their analyses of the relevant texts and they give different weight to the relevant texts.

Klein, William W, et al., Introduction to Biblical Interpretation., 459.

Klein puts his finger on what seems to be the big hurdle that stands before the Bible interpreter: “People come to different positions on the Bible’s teaching on this matter because they bring different preunderstandings to their analyses of the relevant texts and they give different weight to the relevant texts.” The reason the Calvinist and the Arminian cannot see eye to eye is because they are coming to the text with two very different presuppositions.

For example, the Calvinist presupposes that sovereignty means that God is meticulously in control of every single thing in the universe, including the free will choices of men. The Arminians presupposes that God sovereignly limits himself and chooses to sovereignly allow men to be endowed with libertarian freewill. Both positions lead each to emphasize passages in the Bible that (obviously) favor their perspective. What inevitably happens when the two defenders come to the table to present their view, is a proof texting battle. The Calvinist fires their proof texts (e.g. Romans 9:16), and the Arminian theirs (e.g. John 3:16).

Any Hope for Agreement?

So is there any hope for this seemingly hopeless endeavor for clarity and unity? Well, on the one hand, it seems that until Jesus returns godly men and women will be wrestling with this issue. The reason is obvious—the Bible speaks both of God’s sovereignty and human responsibility. Defining what the Bible means by these concepts will take a continual humility, tedious study of the various texts, and a conviction in our hearts that refuses to give up seeking the truth. That said, on the other hand, Klein offers a very helpful principle forward. They write:

But how do you formulate the Bible’s theology? Whether it be biblical or systematic, we cannot espouse a self-structured theology that promotes its own self-serving agenda. Therefore, valid theologizing must follow the sound exegesis of the appropriate biblical texts… theology ought to originate inductively out of a responsible analysis…of the relevant passages of the Bible. It will not do merely to invent theology and seek deductively to defend it in various texts… Unless a system of responsible hermeneutics guides the process of exegesis and theological formulation, theology, at best, will not rise above human wisdom, and at worst, will be false, misguided, tendentious, and even dangerous…A second key point…,theology must be based on the Bible’s total teaching, not on selected or isolated texts. For example, suppose we want to develop a theology of election and free will. We cannot develop a faithful and honest statement of this doctrine if we deny or discount texts that conflict with our preferred theory. If God authored the entire Bible, and if its parts do not hopelessly contradict…then a valid theological statement about an issue must take into account all that God has said concerning it.”

Klein, et al., Biblical Interpretation., 462-463

Bruce Ware helpfully observes:

“Calvinists and Arminians share, in principle, the same mindset that theological systems must not be permitted to rule over the best and most responsible biblical understandings and theological formulations. But the theological system that grows out of and makes the best sense of those most compelling and responsible biblical understandings ought then to be upheld and commended. Calvinism ought to be defended not because of its inherent logic, symmetry, or comprehensive structure per se, but because the substance of its biblical understanding is more compelling than that of its rivals.”

Ware, Bruce., The Grace of God and the Bondage of the Will. Edited by Schreiner, Thomas., and Ware, Bruce., 340.

Ware, speaking on behalf of the Calvinist view acknowledges that theological systems must not rule over good exegesis. In fact, as we have said, systematic theology should flow from sound exegesis, not the other way around. Furthermore, Ware is right when he says that the position—whether Calvinism or Arminians—one favors is not because of its inherent logic but because when placed side by side the one that corresponds most with the biblical data is the one that should be adopted. Therefore, the question for anyone seeking to discover which position is right is this: which position best corresponds most with the biblical data?

At this point I feel compelled again to stress that the issue dividing Calvinists and Arminians is not that one side is biblical and the other side relies on carnal reasoning.[1] Both sides are taking all of the biblical data and seeking to synthesize that data into a well informed theological view that makes the most sense of God’s Soveriegnty and Man’s responsibility. The question is—which side makes BEST sense of the biblical data?

Let’s Summarize

So, to summarize, the way forward is twofold: First, systematic theology of any given topic (in our case God’s sovereignty and Human responsibility) must begin with sound exegesis of passages relevant to the topic. As the authors suggest, one’s conclusions should be formulated inductively out of sound exegesis and not deductively, that is, one comes to the text with his theory in mind and then finds the texts that support said theory.

Second, when wrestling with a topic like the one here, one can’t simply cherry pick texts that are favorable to the interpreter’s presuppositions. One must look at all the relevant texts—especially the ones that seem at odds with their presuppositions—and then seek to exegete those passages as faithfully as one can, in order to avoid allowing one’s presuppositions to govern the outcome. When this has been achieved then a systematic proposal of one’s theological conclusions can be put forward.

I’ll leave you with this

I am under no allusion that what I have said above is a fireproofed approach that will lead to universal unity on this topic! Nor am I suggesting that thoughtful theologians throughout the church are ignorant of these hermeneutical principles. What I am saying is that in order to understand the frustrating circumstances we find ourselves in when dealing with these topics, we have to understand the deeper reality behind the positions each side takes. It’s not as if one side is biblical and the other side is not. Each faithful interpreter is doing their best to come to the Bible and understand what it teaches about God’s sovereignty and human responsibility. Nevertheless, hopefully what I have said here will assist some from avoiding the dangers of simply proof texting their position or disregarding sound exegesis that leads the interpreter to a right systematization of the data. If I have assisted in this way then I am pleased to have written it. But the mere thinking this out for myself has been worth the time alone! More to come on this issue, but for now, To God be the Glory!


[1] This is exactly the rebuke Douglas Wilson places on his opponent during a debate on this very topic. See, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f2nHGlPAs6w

Still Contemplating Calvinism…

So….I’ve been recently reading a lot, and watching a lot of lectures/debates on Calvinism (again!). Honestly, this topic has been one that has intrigued me since I began a serious journey in biblical studies, nearly 20 years ago. The trigger this go ‘round involved my recent study in John 6. Our church is currently going through John’s gospel, so when I encountered those penetrating verses—you know the ones…

  • All that the Father gives me will come to me, and whoever comes to me I will never cast out.
  • And this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up on the last day.
  • No one can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws him. And I will raise him up on the last day.

…yeah, those passages—I found myself pulling out Theologians like Pink; Spurgeon; Edwards; Calvin; Sproul; Piper; Carson—Calvinist men I highly respect. But I also had to balance it, so, I also grabbed Arminius; Cottrell; Shank; Wesley; Brown; Walls; Moore, to name a few. For several hours…well, days! I just kept reading the two positions. Both groups were able to defend their position robustly, and with some humorous sarcasm at times! But as someone who labels himself an Arminian, I still wasn’t convinced to retreat from my convictions.

What I was challenged to do however, was to study the appropriate biblical texts on the subject, along with a systematic approach to the Bible, to look afresh at this very important topic. This conversation unveils a number of very pertinent questions for the serious Bible student. Here are a few I have been re-wrestling with:

  • What does it mean for God to be Sovereign?
  • What is the nature of freewill?
  • What does it mean for God to “love the world?”
  • Does our sinful state presuppose an inability to respond to the Gospel?
  • What is the ordo salutis (i.e. order of salvation)?
  • Can one lose their salvation?
  • Is election unconditional?
  • Can God’s grace be resisted?
  • What is the nature of God’s decree?
  • How the heck is Romans 9 to be interpreted!!!!

 I think the two camps are two honest attempts to understand the character of God and his relationship to His creation. And as “noble” (or, “open minded”, check out the Greek word if you’re interested) Bereans (See Acts 17), we are to (1) take seriously all the Bible has to say about faith and practice, and (2) never grow bored or apathetic when theological issues are hard to resolve.

All this to say, I am still thinking through this issue. I am still an Arminian, but I never want to close myself off from the truth. Like the Bereans I want to “go to the scriptures to see if these things be true.” And so that’s what I plan to do! And probably will be doing that until I die. Then, the Lord will sit both me and my Calvinist friend down, and explain things fully!

One final word. I think as serious Bible students there is a perpetual state we live in, where there is a real tension in regard to these kinds of topics. My encouragement is to live in that tension, with humility as the key character trait to guide you. Furthermore, I think there are two extremes we want to avoid when wrestling with theological differences: 1. Apathy—just not caring to dig in and seek the truth. “Let’s just all get along” and 2. Close mindedness—thinking we have it all together and never open to change our position if the truth leads us there. The answer is to “study to show ourselves approved (see 2 Tim 2:15).” And then to be humble and always open minded to the truth!

Alright..back to reading!

The Bible’s Clear Teaching on the Deity of Jesus Christ.

If I were sitting across from someone seeking proof that the Bible teaches that Jesus is God I would offer them the following three points. This is obviously not an exhaustive outline of all the Bible has to say about the deity of Jesus Christ, but a good place to start. I hope you find the following outline beneficial in your understanding of this important doctrine.

#1 Passages that unequivocally teach that Jesus is God

John 1:1

Colwell’s rule shows that John 1:1 is correctly translated “The word was God (Not the Word was A God).” Colwell’s rule simply states that in the event where the predicate noun precedes the copulative verb (the verb “to be”) then the predicate noun will drop the article. The reason the Jehovah Witness’ translation reads “the word was A god” is because in the Greek the definite article is absent before “God.” But they simply are incorrect about Greek grammar as the above rule specifies.

John 5:18 and 19:7

This was why the Jews were seeking all the more to kill him, because not only was he breaking the Sabbath, but he was even calling God his own Father, making himself equal with God (John 5:18)

The Pharisees claimed Jesus being equal to God and Jesus never denied there claim.

John 5:19-24

John 5:17-24 is basically saying –“Like Father , Like Son.”

Mark Moore metaphorically speaks of Jesus pointing to his sameness to God as having the

  • Same power
  • Same hands
  • Same eyes
  • Same breath
  • Same tongue
  • Same honor

Same Power

The issue is raised when Jesus says what he says in verse 17—“may father is working and so I am working…”

“My Father-“—first shocker! He makes God his personal father—points to the nature of his relationship with God

“I am working…” Points to his eternal omnipotent power with the father!

So Jesus first points to the fact that he is one with the father in eternal power!

17 And he is before all things, and in him all things hold together.(Colossians 1:17)

 He is the radiance of the glory of God and the exact imprint of his nature, and he upholds the universe by the word of his power.(Hebrews 1:3)

Same Hands (5:19)

Everything the father does the son does

Same eyes (5:20)

“father Shows him all he himself is doing…”

Same breath (5:21)

Raises the dead and gives life…

Same tongue (5:22)

Judges the world

Same Honor (5:23)

The most radical statement! He is saying that you are to worship the son just as you worship God the father!

Application—the real Jesus is first God in flesh! The eternal begotten son!

That we worship one God in trinity and the trinity in unity,
    neither blending their persons
    nor dividing their essence.
        For the person of the Father is a distinct person,
        the person of the Son is another,
        and that of the Holy Spirit still another.
        But the divinity of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit is one,
        their glory equal, their majesty coeternal
  What quality the Father has, the Son has, and the Holy Spirit has.
        The Father is uncreated,
        the Son is uncreated,
        the Holy Spirit is uncreated.
    The Father is immeasurable,
        the Son is immeasurable,
        the Holy Spirit is immeasurable
The Father is eternal,
        the Son is eternal,
        the Holy Spirit is eternal.
And yet there are not three eternal beings;
            there is but one eternal being.
            So too there are not three uncreated or immeasurable beings;
            there is but one uncreated and immeasurable being.

Athanasius Creed (4th Century) 

John 8:58

“I Am” is the same name God gives himself in Exodus when speaking to Moses—see Exodus 3:14

John 20:28

Here Thomas explicitly calls Jesus Lord (kyrios) and God (theos). Those who claim that Thomas was involuntarily speaking to God about Jesus’ appearance miss the emphatic phrase “Thomas answered and said to him.” That is, Thomas directed his comment to Jesus himself. He was not merely speaking abstractly into the Heavens.

Acts 3:15

Jesus is called the “Author of life.” The word “author” is the Greek word “archegos.” Zodhiates defines this word as “originator, founder, leader, chief, first, prince, as distinguished from simply being the cause.” 

Philippians 2:5-11

Have this mind among yourselves, which is yours in Christ Jesus, who, though he was in the form of God, did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped, but emptied himself, by taking the form of a servant, being born in the likeness of men. And being found in human form, he humbled himself by becoming obedient to the point of death, even death on a cross. Therefore God has highly exalted him and bestowed on him the name that is above every name, 10so that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth, 11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Philippians 2:5-11
  • “Form”- the nature or character of something, with emphasis upon both the internal and external form—‘nature, character (Louw-Nida)
  • “Equality”- pertaining to that which is equal, either in number, size, quality, or characteristics—‘equal, equivalent, same (Louw-Nida)
  • “Emptied Himself”- The incarnation.
  • Verses 9-10- Quoted from Isaiah 45:23 about God.

Colossians 2:9

For in him the whole fullness of deity dwells bodily,

Titus 2:13 and 2 Peter 1:1

Both these passages fall into the category of the Granville sharp rule, which states “when two nouns of the same case are connected by kai, a single article before the first noun denotes conceptual unity, whereas the repetition of the article denotes particularity.  In these two passages “God” and “Savior” are governed by one article. Thus, God and savior refer to Jesus. It is wrong to render the passage “of our God and of our savior Jesus Christ,” distinguishing between God and Jesus. The proper understanding is that Jesus is both God and savior.

Hebrews 1:3

The Son is the member of the Godhead chosen to be the exegete (the revealer) of God’s glory and it is only through His revelation that God can be known, Matt. 11:27; John 1:18; 12:45; 14:9. The Son is “the brightness” (the effulgence, the radiation, the outshining, the out-raying) of God’s glory (we do not see the sun itself but its being and its glory are revealed to us by its rays, its outshining). Christ is the member of the Trinity who out-rays the otherwise inscrutable God.[1]

He is stated to be the expresser of God’s person (essence). He is the precise expression, the perfect resembler, the exact reproduction, the accurate counterpart, the express image, of God (because He is God and possesses the same nature as God). Christ is the only image of God that we are permitted to worship for He is the only perfect image of God. All other images of God are caricatures of God and so tell lies about God.[2]

1 John 5:20

Here Jesus is clearly called the true God. He in the latter part of the verse clearly fits the antecedent “Jesus Christ.”

#2 The New Testament quotes Old Testament Passages that in their original context referred to God, but in the New Testament they apply them to Jesus.

Texts:

  • Psalm 45:6-7……………………………….Hebrews 1:8-10
  • Psalm 110:1…………………………………Matthew 22:41-46
  •  Isaiah 6…………………………………………John 12:39-41
  • Isaiah 9:6………………………………………Luke 2:11
  • Isaiah 40:3…………………………………….Matthew 3:3

Comments:             

  • Psalm 45:6-7

This quotation from Psalm 45:6-7 is a description of Jehovah God. The Hebrew writer applies the meaning to Jesus Christ.

  • Psalm 110:1

The most quoted OT passage in the NT.

Jesus uses this passage in Matthew 22:41-46, Mark 12:35-37, and Luke 20:41-44 to prove his messiahship and deity. The verse implies that the Lord (Jehovah) said to my Lord (Jesus the son) sit at my right hand. How can Jehovah speak to himself? He must have been referring to another person.

  • Isaiah 6

After quoting Isaiah 6:10 John (12:39-41) refers to Jesus as the one he saw in the vision recorded in Isaiah 6:1-6.

  • Isaiah 9:6

This messianic passage explicitly calls Jesus “mighty God.”

Some state that the term mighty God is different than almighty God. They point out the fact that only the term almighty God is a reference to Jehovah whereas “mighty God can refer to anyone. This is simply not true. In Isaiah 10:21 and Jeremiah 32:18 both refer to Jehovah as “mighty God”

  • Isaiah 40:3

Prophetic text referring to the messiah. Used by John the Baptist in Matthew 2 as he prepared the way for Christ. In this passage the terms Lord and God are both used to describe Jesus.

#3 If God is the only one worthy of worship (Matthew 4:10) why then is Jesus worshipped?

  • Matthew 2:2,11
  • John 20:28
  • Hebrews 1:6
  • Revelation 5:14
  • Revelation 22:3

Note: In Rev. 22:9-10 John falls down and begins to worship the angel who had been speaking to him in the vision. But the angel stops John, and tells him not to worship him, but to worship God. It is only fitting then that if both the son and the father are worshipped in Revelation then both are in fact God. If not, then John contradicts his own message when he pictures Jesus as being worshipped.


[1] Roy E. Gingrich, The Book of Hebrews (Memphis, TN: Riverside Printing, 2004), 11.

[2] Roy E. Gingrich, The Book of Hebrews (Memphis, TN: Riverside Printing, 2004), 11–12.

How Ellen Degeneres’ Joy Points to Eternal Sorrow. 

Ellen Degeneres hosted her final talk show episode this week after 20 years of programming. Not surprisingly, the emotions were high as she recounted various highlights from the shows history. Ellen has a contagious sense of humor and quickly became one of the most beloved TV hosts on daytime television. One of the guests on her final episode was popular singer Pink. She summed up Ellen’s influence by stating, “I love you so much it’s dumb. You help people find their joy.” Helping people find joy was, by Ellen’s own testimony, a personal goal of hers, she explains,

“If this show has made you smile, if it has lifted you up when you’re in a period of some type of pain, some type of sadness, anything you are going through, then I have done my job. Because of this platform we have been able to change people’s lives.” 

View article Here.

But have lives been changed because of Ellen’s message of joy? Some would respond with a hearty “amen.” If by joy we mean to convey, brief laughter that provides momentary distraction from the inevitable pain and sorrow a broken world brings—then o.k., Ellen did accomplish that. However, if we understand  “joy” as the consistent inner peace despite our circumstances, provided only through a genuine, life-transformational, relationship with the creator of the universe, through His son, Jesus Christ—then no. Ellen has failed to provide such genuine joy. 

The reason Ellen is unable to promote true, genuine joy, is because she herself has not discovered true joy. She has failed to go to the source where this everlasting joy resides—namely through faith in Jesus Christ (see Romans 5:1, 1 Peter 1:6). In fact, one of her proudest accomplishments involved promoting a lifestyle that was the exact opposite of the Lord’s will for her life. Heres how she describes it:

“When we started this show, I couldn’t say ‘gay’ on the show. I was not allowed to say ‘gay.’ I said it at home a lot. ‘What are we having for our gay breakfast?’ Or ‘pass the gay salt.’ [Or] ‘Has anyone seen the gay remote?’ — things like that.”

“I couldn’t say we, because that implied that I was with someone. Sure couldn’t say wife, that’s because it wasn’t legal for gay people to get married. And now I say wife all the time. Twenty five years ago they canceled my sitcom because they didn’t want a lesbian to be in primetime once a week. So I said, ‘Ok, I’ll be in daytime every day, how ’bout that?’”

From a secular viewpoint this is a prized accomplishment. To be a part of the progressive inclusion of the LGBTQ community; successfully ridding society of the so-called stigma that sam-sex relationships are bad; helping others embrace an affirming worldview—This is something to be joyful about! 

But what does a Christian worldview have to say in response to this? The Bible is crystal clear—the sexually immoral will not inherit the Kingdom of Heaven (1 Cor. 6:9). This means that in God’s design true joy is to be found in the marriage bond between one man and one woman for life (Matthew 19). It means that happiness is not based on doing what one ‘feels’ is best, but submitting to God’s will for your life, and obeying Him no matter the cost. When Jesus sought to describe joy he did so in relation to his commandments. He said,

“If you keep my commandments, you will abide in my love, just as I have kept my Father’s commandments and abide in his love. These things I have spoken to you, that my joy may be in you, and that your joy may be full.”

John 15:10-11)

Ellen can offer temporary laughter that will sustain for a moment. But true lasting joy only comes from knowing Jesus, surrendering ones life totally to him, and seeking to obey all he commanded. Eternal joy is only realized through saving faith in Christ. 

My heart breaks for folks like Ellen. They long to have joy and offer joy to others. What they don’t realize is that after the laughter dwindles, the reality of eternal hopelessness bubbles back up to the surface of the soul. The only true joy comes from Jesus. Everything else is a temporary bandaid that may get us to through till the next episode. Now that Ellen is off air, where are her viewers going to find lasting joy? I submit they never had it. 

A Right Attitude for Church Growth

Our church has recently experienced some numerical growth in our Sunday attendance. I am grateful and admittedly excited about this trend. I don’t know of many preachers who feel discouraged when numbers are going up! But I also find myself quickly checking my motives regarding numeric growth. In the back of my mind I am always aware that God’s blessing can easily turn into Will’s doing. To help keep things in balance I am drawn back to scripture. There, God does his work on my heart and reminds me who is in charge. In Paul’s letter to the Corinthian Church I am reminded of four godly attitudes all of us need to have concerning church growth. 

But I, brothers, could not address you as spiritual people, but as people of the flesh, as infants in Christ. 2 I fed you with milk, not solid food, for you were not ready for it. And even now you are not yet ready, 3 for you are still of the flesh. For while there is jealousy and strife among you, are you not of the flesh and behaving only in a human way? 4 For when one says, “I follow Paul,” and another, “I follow Apollos,” are you not being merely human?5 What then is Apollos? What is Paul? Servants through whom you believed, as the Lord assigned to each. 6 I planted, Apollos watered, but God gave the growth. 7 So neither he who plants nor he who waters is anything, but only God who gives the growth.(1 Corinthians 3:1-7)

Be Content and bloom where you are planted 

When Paul addresses the church at Corinth he first rebukes them for an unhealthy practice of the comparison game between church leaders. Some were saying “I follow Apollos,” others, “I follow Paul…” Even in the first century the church fell prey to the comparison game. Oh how things seldom change! How often do we as preachers and church leaders do the same. We observe other local churches with disdain and frustration just because they are larger or have been blessed in ways we have not. Bob Russell, former minister of Southeast Christian Church, reminds us all that no matter how big your church gets, this comparison game is always raising its ugly head:


“A few years into my ministry Southeast Christian Church was listed in a national religious magazine as the six fastest growing church in America. That was a big ego boost… For about 10 minutes. Then I begin asking “who are those other five? Are they telling the truth? I wonder if we can get ahead of them and be number one next year.… Take it from someone who has been blessed to be in a church that grew steadily for a long time. Enough is never enough.”

(Russell, Bob, After Fifty Years of Ministry, 82-83.)

Instead of playing the comparison game we need to be content and bloom where we are planted. We need to recognize the God has called us to the church we are serving. Thus, He is requiring faithfulness, not fruitfulness from our ministry. Furthermore, Instead of comparing ourselves to the unique outcome of other churches around us, perhaps we call up our fellow church leaders and thank them for their service—even if you don’t agree with all their programs and methodology! 

Do the hard work and don’t become complacent 

Notice in the passage, Paul says he and Apollos planted and watered! Though we are called to be content where God has placed us, it does not mean we are called to be complacent. There is a large difference between contentment and complacency. Many times we don’t see growth because we are not willing to do the hard work! Paul says elsewhere: 

 For this I toil, struggling with all his energy that he powerfully works within me.(Col. 1:29). The word translated “struggling” is where we get our English word “agonize” from. We can’t complain about stunted growth when we fail to put in the hard work.

Contentment is a settled conviction and resolve that you have given it your best. Complacency is settling for mediocrity but expecting the result of hard work.

Thom Rainer offers Characteristics of a complacent church in his book “Autopsy of a deceased Church.” If these characterize your church perhaps you are placing personal comfort over Purposeful growth.

  • The Past is the hero—“we’ve never done it that way before.”
  • The church refuses to look like the community—“We don’t want new visitors taking our seats”
  • The great commission becomes the great omission—These churches are internally focused. 
  • The Preference –driven church—These churches are never open to change in methodology. 

Trust that God will give the growth 

Notice the passage again, Paul says—“But God gave the growth”And again in Colossians 1: For this I toil, struggling with all his energy that he powerfully works within me.(Col. 1:29)

This is what should keep every Church leader in check—no matter what happens in the church, all the glory, and all the praise, for any success, deserves to go to God and Him alone! 

Additionally, when we realize that God is the one who ultimately grows the church we can rest at ease when it comes to the results. If we are giving it our all and willing to “struggle” for the ministry, we should rest our heads on the pillow of grace every night, knowing God will take it from there! And as Al Mohler has said, “Leaders often overestimate what can be accomplished in a single year, but underestimate what can be accomplished in a decade.” (Mohler, Albert, The Conviction to Lead, 194.) Keep persevering fellow Pastor! You plant and water and let God grow the church.

Stay Humble 

I absolutely love verse 7: “So neither he who plants nor he who waters is anything, but only God who gives the growth.” 

If you ever get to a point where you think the success of your ministry is because of your talent, skill, and charisma, you have arrived at the very opposite end of where God wants you. 

The healthy church leader always recognizes that we are merely servants of Christ (see 3:5) and in reality ‘nothing.” It is God who gets the praise! 

How can I know what God’s will is?

One of the questions I receive often is, “how can I know God’s will in my life?” Perhaps you have pondered that question yourself; I know I have.

Initially, when I hear that question I usually think of It in a broad and general sense: God’s will is pretty clear, to worship and glorify God and make disciples of all nations—or, as my church has verbalized it: “to pursue maturity by making disciples.”

But what I think is on people’s minds when they ask that question is what specifically and particularly does God want me to do to fulfill that general will? We know God’s will in this broad sense, but is there a specific thing he wants me to do?

God’s particular will for my specific context is not as easy to answer. The reason is because we, unlike God, do not have omniscience. Omniscience is one of those incommunicable attributes that is unique to Him. So while God knows every minute detail of our lives, down to the very hairs on our head, we do not. Thus, our limited perspective about the future erodes certainty concerning particular decisions in the present.

Allow Me To Illustrate

For example, I made the decision at the age of twenty-seven to take a pastoral position in a church in South Carolina, and cease serving as an associate in a church in Tennessee.

Or take the minister I had served with in Tennessee who had three adopted boys. He and his wife gained custody of them when they were just newborns, and their first three children were already grown and out of the house at the time. They could have moved into the second half of their lives and enjoyed the empty-nester phase. However, they chose to take on three newborn babies, and start the rearing children phase all over again.

A minister I worked with in my early twenties was a gentleman who was in the business world before taking the call to pastor a church. He had a good job, lots of benefits, and had room to move up in the company. However, in his early 30’s he chose to let go of it all and pursue full time ministry. It involved a pay decrease, hours of seminary preparation, and no doubt a good bit of sacrifice.

In the three examples above the following questions might be asked: Was this the will of God in each situation? Was the right decision made? What if in each situation a different decision was chosen and if so would that mean that the person in question was out of God’s will?

These cases address the heart of the issue. How do we discern and decide what God’s will is in our particular circumstances?

Should Paul Have Gone To Jerusalem?

There is a narrative in the book of Acts that I believe offers some very helpful principles for guiding us through these seemingly difficult questions. It involves the Apostle Paul and his particular decision to travel to Jerusalem, despite numerous voices advising him not to do so. I want to observe a few interesting points that develop in light of this story and then offer five suggestions when it comes to discerning God’s particular will in our lives today.

The passage under consideration is Acts 21:1-16. Paul is on route to Jerusalem. In the previous pericope we are told that Paul was eager to get there before Pentecost (see 20:16). When Paul arrives at Tyre and shares with the disciples where he is headed the disciples “were telling Paul not to go to Jerusalem (21:4).” In fact, this is what the elders in Ephesus days prior were communicating (20:37-38), and the same was said to Paul in Ptolemais in 21:12. Everyone it seemed was urging Paul to not go to Jerusalem.

But why? The text makes it clear—Paul would face extreme suffering if he went. The Holy Spirit himself told Paul that this would happen . In Acts 20:23 Paul tells the Ephesian elders, “the holy Spirit testifies to me in every city that imprisonment and afflictions await me.” Later on this testimony was verified by the prophet Agabus, “thus says the Holy Spirit, ‘this is how the Jews at Jerusalem will bind the man who owns this belt and deliver him into the hands of the Gentiles (Acts 21:11).’”

Paul on the other hand seemed confident and determined to go to Jerusalem. Despite the knowledge that he would experience suffering in Jerusalem he was resolved to go. When Paul was first converted on the road to Damascus the Lord Jesus himself explained to Ananias that “he is a chosen instrument of mine to carry my name before the Gentiles and kings and children of Israel *Acts 9:15).” During his third missionary journey it is evident that Paul has made up his mind concerning Jerusalem, “Paul resolved in the spirit to…go to Jerusalem (Acts 19:21).” And the inevitable suffering he would face was no deterrent for him, “What are you doing, weeping and breaking my heart? For I am ready not only to be imprisoned but even to die in Jerusalem for the name of the Lord Jesus (Acts 21:13).”

Why Did Paul Go To Jerusalem?

Why was Jerusalem so important to Paul? 2 reasons: First, during Paul’s travels he not only encouraged and admonished the various churches he had planted, he also was collecting money to take back as a relief effort for the church in Jerusalem (see 1 Corinthians 16:1-9 for details about this collection). The second reason was that Jerusalem was the last stop before he would head toward Rome. Paul’s travel to Rome was really his ultimate desire. But why Rome? Because Paul’s ultimate desire and purpose in life was to take the Gospel to the Gentile world. And because Rome in Paul’s day was the apex of the Gentile mission it would fulfill his life endeavor to preach the Gospel there. Paul summarizes this ida in Romans 15:19-20, “so that from Jerusalem and all the way around to Illyricum I have fulfilled the ministry of the gospel of Christ; and thus I make it my ambition to preach the gospel, not where Christ has already been named, lest I build on someone else’s foundation.”

So, Paul was determined to go to Jerusalem and ultimately Rome. However, all of his friends were begging him not to go because of the possibility that he may be hurt, arrested, or worse, killed. This leads us to one more peculiar observation in the text. In Acts 21:4 we have an unusual statement recorded by Luke: “And having sought out the disciples, we stayed there for seven days. And through the Spirit they were telling Paul not to go on to Jerusalem.” This is peculiar because it seems at first glance that Luke is making the Holy Spirit contradict himself. The reason is because the Holy Spirit has already made it abundantly clear that Paul must go to Jerusalem. Or has He?

Did The Holy Spirit Communicate Different Things?

It is not always clear in Greek when the word translated “Spirit” is referring to the Holy Spirit or ones human spirit (that is, when the adjective “holy” is not in front of the word “spirit.”). In our English translations this is distinguished when the word spirit has a capital “S” or lowercase “s.” It is context that must be the deciding factor in these cases. With this in mind consider the following verses:

Now after these events Paul resolved in the spirit to pass through Macedonia and Achaia and go to Jerusalem, saying, “After I have been there, I must also see Rome.”(Acts 19:21)

And now, behold, I am going to Jerusalem, constrained by the spirit, not knowing what will happen to me there (Acts 20:22)

except that the Holy Spirit testifies to me in every city that imprisonment and afflictions await me (Acts 20:23)

“Thus says the Holy Spirit, ‘This is how the Jews at Jerusalem will bind the man who owns this belt and deliver him into the hands of the Gentiles.’”

Perhaps what we have in these texts is Paul’s human spirit resolved to go to Jerusalem because of his deep desire to take the Gospel eventually to those in Rome, while at the same time The Holy Spirit clearly communicating to Paul that IF he does go he will face extreme difficulty when he arrives. But what then do we do with the seemingly contradictory verse in 21:4? Let’s remind ourselves— “And through the Spirit they were telling Paul not to go on to Jerusalem.”

The best way to reconcile this verse with what we know of the others is to conclude that the phrase “Through the Spirit” does in fact refer to the Holy Spirit. But perhaps it is Luke’s way of saying something like, “through what the Holy Spirit had made clear about what would happen to Paul in Jerusalem…” The phrase “ They were telling Paul not to go on to Jerusalem” refers to the response these disciples had in light of what the Holy Spirit had revealed about Paul’s trials that lay ahead of him. In other words, throughout these narratives the Holy Spirit ONLY reveals WHAT would happen if Paul was to go to Jerusalem, but he never reveals to Paul, or anyone else for that matter, that Paul MUST GO to Jerusalem. Stott says it well, “perhaps Luke’s statement is a condensed way of saying that the warning was divine while the urging was human (Stott John, Acts).” This is why there is division on whether or not Paul should go. Paul is resolved in his spirit to go because he has a gut wrenching purpose fueling him. His friends are all begging him not to go because they have a deep love for their mentor of the faith and fear they will lose him. Both parties are having to make decisions based on their convictions.

Lessons to Learn from this Passage about discerning the Will of God

What then can we take away from this passage about discerning God’s particular will for our lives? Let me offer five:

Obeying the Will of the Lord is usually not easy.

It was plain to Paul that if he were to go to Jerusalem he would face very troublesome times. Nevertheless, Paul chose to go because he had resolved in his spirit that he needed to do it. When we are faced with multiple choices regarding something we feel God is calling us to do, we shouldn’t simply default to the easiest option. In fact, more times than not, the road less traveled is the one in which we are to take. Paul himself seemed to lean this way in general:

strengthening the souls of the disciples, encouraging them to continue in the faith, and saying that through many tribulations we must enter the kingdom of God.(Acts 14:22)

Indeed, all who desire to live a godly life in Christ Jesus will be persecuted,(2 Timothy 3:12)

When seeking to discern the will of God we need to ask: what will bring the most glory to Christ and what will further the mission of the Gospel?

Paul had resolved to go to Jerusalem because it was the path that would lead him to carry his mission to the Gentile world. For Paul the Gospel was the map that pointed him to his proper destination. It wasn’t about ease, comfort, or what would bring him the most satisfaction personally. Paul had one thing in mind when it came to deciding where to go and what choice to make—what will bring the Gospel to the most amount of people? The answer to that question guided his decision.

When you have determined what God’s will is resolve to obey it no matter what the cost.

On his way to Jerusalem every stop Paul would make his friends all would say the same thing—“don’t go!.” Can you imagine the pressure? You get a glimpse of it while Paul is in Ptolemais: “What are you doing, weeping and breaking my heart? (Acts 21:13).” Can you sense the emotional struggle Paul had as they begged him not to go? And yet, Paul was resolved! He knew no matter what that God was calling him to go to Jerusalem. We too, must seek this kind of resolve. Of course much council should be sought after, we must bathe our decision in prayer, but at some point we must get off the fence, and determine to do what God is calling us to do.

If you are counseling someone who is seeking advice about what they should do show compassion, care, and concern. However, afterward leave the consequences and results to the will of the Lord.

This is what the disciples at Ptolemais eventually decided to do. “And since he would not be persuaded, we ceased and said, “Let the will of the Lord be done (Acts 21:14).”

Trust God’s sovereign Will as you seek to obey it.

When Paul finally reaches Jerusalem the prophecy of the Holy Spirit came to pass just as He had said. Paul is met with an angry mob, is beaten, and arrested. I’m sure that it must have ran through his mind, “did I make the right choice?” And as we seek to wisely make decisions about where God is leading us we too will face moments of doubt and trouble. It is here that we find the Lord’s words to Paul just as relevant to us today: “The following night the Lord stood by him and said, “Take courage, for as you have testified to the facts about me in Jerusalem, so you must testify also in Rome (Acts 23:11).” In the middle of that Cell the Lord verified that Paul was on the right track. I think as we seek to follow God’s particular will for our lives we also can hear the Lord say to us, “take courage.”

Conclusion

God’s will is to Love Him and tell others to do the same. But how that will play out in each of our individual lives is going to take some good discernment and wisdom. I find it fascinating that a few years later, in one of the letters written, while in Rome under house arrest, Paul gives the church at Ephesus two statements, that had to come, in part, from his experience getting there:

try to discern what is pleasing to the Lord…Look carefully then how you walk, not as unwise but as wise, making the best use of the time, because the days are evil. Therefore do not be foolish, but understand what the will of the Lord is (Ephesians 5:10, 15-17).”

Being Bereans: 8 Steps for Studying Scripture

In the book of Acts during Paul’s second missionary Journey, Luke records two contrasting pictures of how someone receives and pursues the truth of God’s Word. On the one hand there are those in Thessalonica. These Jews heard Paul and only a few were persuaded. The majority rejected Paul’s teaching because they were unwilling to honesty hear what he had to say. On the other hand were the Bereans. Here’s what Luke says of them:

Now these Jews were more noble than those in Thessalonica; they received the word with all eagerness, examining the Scriptures daily to see if these things were so.

Acts 17:11

It’s not as if these Bereans naively accepted Paul’s words without any challenge or investigation. No, they “examined the scriptures to see if these things were so.” G. Campbell Morgan expresses this well:

“It was not a quick belief that made them noble, for they were skeptical; but their skepticism was accompanied by determined anxiety to find out. The noble hearer is not the man who immediately says yes to the interpretation of the preacher. The noble hearer is the man who appeals again and again to the scriptures themselves, to find out if these things be true.”

G. Campbell Morgan

The noble Bereans set an example not just for skeptics who hear the gospel for the first time; they exemplify principles that every believer should desire. We should all desire to “examine the scriptures.”

That said, how are we to go about examining the scriptures? I want to offer 8 simple steps in examining your Bible carefully in order to get the most out of it, with the desire to know the author of the Bible deeper.

  1. Read the text—I don’t mean your 30 minute devotional each morning. No, I mean start with a book of the Bible, take one paragraph at a time, and read that paragraph over and over again. Read it, and then read it again. Read it. Pause. Reflect. And then read it again.
  2. Observe the Text—After you read the passage before you, take out a pen and interact with the words on the page. If you don’t like to write in your Bible then print the passage out on a piece of paper. Circle words that stick out to you. Underline phrases you may not understand. Notice words that repeat. Point out important connecting words like conjunctions and adverbs that connect phrases together. Exhaust with your pen everything you see in the text. By doing this you can begin to make sense of how the passage fits together.
  3. Ask the text questions—After you have observed all you can in the passage begin asking the text questions. What is this place mentioned here? What does this word mean? Why does the author use this term? How does this passage connect with what comes before and after? How does this passage fit into the larger context of the chapter; the book; the Bible? Are there people, places, words, anything that you don’t now? Right it down! What you are trying to do at this point is get to the heart of what the author intended to communicate in the words he has written down. The answers to these questions will supply the meaning of the text before you.
  4. Summarize the text—After you have attempted to answer all of the questions you will inevitably have a concoction of material before you. Now you can begin summarizing all of your material into a terse proposition. Ask yourself this question—“if I could summarize this passage in a sentence or two what would it be?” By doing this you will be able to get a grip on what the author was seeking to communicate. All of your study up to this point has been for the purpose of grasping the main idea of the passage. It is summarizing all of the details in the passage into a succinct idea.
  5. Ask a “Paul” about the text—One of my sayings is that every Christian needs a “Paul” and a “Timothy.” That is, each of us need someone to help guide us in understanding the scriptures, and we need to be guiding someone in the scriptures. Thus, after you have poured hours into your passage take all of your conclusions and discuss them with someone who is mature in their knowledge of the Bible. Articulate how you have come to your conclusions and see what wisdom they have to offer about your findings.
    Additionally, this may be a good time to consult a few good Bible Commentaries. Bible commentaries are like inviting top Bible scholars over to your house to discuss what they think about the text. As I read their comments on my passage I listen to what they say, glean insight, disagree, agree, wrestle with them, etc. All of this is helpful in me gaining understanding and clarifying the truth of the passage.
  6. Teach a “Timothy” what you have discovered in the text—Now you are ready to share what you have learned with another person. Find someone who is not as far as you are in their spiritual maturity and offer to disciple them. Take what you are learning and allow them to ask you questions. Now you can offer confident answers as you have invested much time in study. This will also allow the Bible to plant deeply in your heart. I have discovered the greatest way for the Bible to stick with me is to communicate its truth to another person. When someone else can then articulate what you have taught them you have mastered the material!
  7. Pray—It would be inappropriate for me not to mention this crucial step. Throughout the entire process you must seek the Lord in asking him to lead and guide you into all truth. Pray your whole process through. Never stop seeking the Lord’s guidance as you seek to understand the Bible’s content.
  8. Repeat—Alright, do you feel good about that passage? Now move to the next one and repeat each step above! Do this year after year, day after day, and you will grow in your knowledge of the scriptures! And like the noble Bereans you will “receive the word with eagerness!”

Seeking Truth in a Confused World.

Then Pilate said to him, “So you are a king?” Jesus answered, “You say that I am a king. For this purpose I was born and for this purpose I have come into the world—to bear witness to the truth. Everyone who is of the truth listens to my voice.” Pilate said to him, “What is truth?”(John 18:37-38)

What is Truth?

Pilate’s question to Jesus, “what is truth?” Is the quintessential question for our day and age. Each of us are faced with this question daily as our culture debates and argues over numerous moral and ethical controversies. Can a practicing homosexual be a Christian? Is abortion sinful? Is there systemic racism in our country? Is critical race theory beneficial to our ethical framework? Is the Bible inerrant? Is Christianity the only true religion? Is Jesus the only way to salvation? These and a plethora of other questions knock on our mental front doors on a regular basis. We can’t ignore them because, if for no other reason, our young children are curious, and they need answers.

Modernism

Every generation has to wrestle with the question of what is true. Rewind a few hundred years ago and leaders in the modern era of the 18th and 19th centuries decided that truth was absolutely certain. They emphasized that reality could be rationally observed through the scientific method. Modernist scientist were elated that science had paved the way to certainty. However, the downside to this discovery was the demythologizing of a biblical worldview. Liberal theology, influenced by the modern era, decided that the supernatural elements of scripture couldn’t be true. Thus, Jesus was a good moral teacher but not the son of God; he was a master of ethics but not one who bore the sins of the world. Today the modern era is embodied by the most proactive atheists such as Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, and the late Christopher Hitchens. They, along with many others, proclaim the words of Nietzche, “God is dead.”

Postmodernism

Postmodernism reacted to the arrogance they saw in the modernists. As often is the case, post modernists of the 20th century moved the pendulum to the opposite side of the table. If modernists prided themselves in absolute certainty, postmodernists prided themselves in ambiguity. Postmodernism says there is no absolute truth, which is ironically an absolute truth claim. Nevertheless, popular church leaders, eventually calling their movement “the emergent church,” took postmodernism and baptized it into their local churches. Leaders like Brian Mclaren and Rob Bell began popularizing the virtue of uncertainty. Truth became what one individual made it, and truth was ever evolving. In an interview, Brian Mclaren was asked about his stance on homosexuality. His answer: “ask me in five years.” That answer reveals the heart of post modernism. It denies any concrete truth.

Post-Truth

Finally, we come to our current era, what some have called the “post truth” era. It says that there is objective truth but it is subordinated by our feelings and preferences. Post truth proponents see objective facts as less influential in shaping public opinion, than appeals to emotion and personal belief. This is clear by observing the sexual revolution happening in our culture today. For example, despite the overwhelming, and commonsensical, biological evidence of male and female, transgenderism says “I base my biological sex on how I feel and not what is obviously real.” Despite one’s biological makeup, maleness and femaleness is determined by subjective feelings. This by definition is preposterous.

The Answer to the Question

Let’s return to Pilate’s question, “what is truth?” How do we know what is true? Notice our text again—“everyone on the side of truth LISTENS TO ME.” According to Jesus He must become the final authority for what is moral, right, good, and true. Jesus must be the filter by which Christians govern their lives. Questions about sexuality, marriage, life, race, justice, righteousness, morality, Heaven, hell, good, bad. . . every aspect of our lives must be interpreted through a christological, gospel-centered, lens.

We also need to avoid what Jack Cottrell calls the Christological fallacy. This is the fallacy that says the red letters of our Bibles are more important than everything else in the Bible. In fact, there is a particular group that brands themselves “red letter Christians.” But when Jesus says to Pilate “everyone on the side of truth listens to me” he means truth as recorded and preserved in our sixty-six books of the Bible. Jesus said just a chapter earlier in John’s gospel that God’s “word is truth (John 17:17).” The Apostle Paul says “all scripture is God-breathed (2 Timothy 3:16).” Jude says that we have the “faith once for all delivered to the Saints (Jude 3).”

Pilate’s question, “what is truth?” is heart breaking because he was looking into the eyes of truth himself. Similarly, the search for truth through the last 200 years is equally disappointing because God’s word is truth, and yet its pages are either completely ignored or twisted to such a degree truth is misrepresented. Wisdom and truth begin by seeking our creator and listening to what He has revealed. As the sage said many years ago: “Trust in the Lord with all your heart, and do not lean on your own understanding (Proverbs 3:5).”

Kevin Max deconstructing his faith and my plea to the struggling Christian.

Another popular, evangelical leader has decided to leave the faith. This time it is Kevin Max, former singer of DC Talk. He announced his exiting of the evangelical scene with the hashtag “exvangelical.” Later, he would tweet, “Hey, it’s ok to be estranged from everything that you were taught.” This would be good advice, except the thing he is estranging himself from is ironically the truth he is so desperately looking for! The apostle Paul would offer our brother some different words. If Paul were using the medium of twitter today I can imagine he would respond to brother Max’s tweet with the following:

“Cling to your faith in Christ, and keep your conscience clear. For some people have deliberately violated their consciences; as a result, their faith has been shipwrecked.” (1 Timothy 1:19.) #truthisinJesus

If I can be so bold, may I encourage any fellow believer who may be thinking of following a similar path as the DC Talk superstar—Don’t! Oh how painful, how dreadful, how sorrowful a decision! To walk away from the “faith once for all delivered to the saints” is as grievous as Judas kissing the face of Jesus, only to sell him for the price of a slave. Or as preposterous as Pontius Pilate staring truth in the eyes and asking him, “what is truth?!”

Oh shaken and confused friend, can’t you see that the truth is in Jesus (Eph 4:21)? Can’t you see that enveloped in his word is the truth you seek, for his word is truth (John 17: 17)? Stop looking to the worldly philosophers on twitter and the social activists filling your media feeds for answers. Look to the Bible; look to the revealed word of God for the truth. There, you will discover a “lamp for your feet and a light to your path” (Psalm 119:105). How my heart breaks with each of these gut-wrenching stories. The Lord grieves for our generation just as he did those alive when he walked our sod. Jesus is saying now what he said then—“oh exvangelical, how I would have gathered you as a hen gathers her chicks, under her wings, but you were unwilling (Matthew 23:37).”